The audit behind that claim, published in full. Two tiers: structural integrity across all 29.8 million facts, and source-verified accuracy on a stratified sample checked back to the filing it cites. Every number carries its method and its exceptions.
Conflating them is how a vendor claims 99% without proving it. We publish both, separately.
Does the corpus contradict itself? Checkable from the fact rows alone, so it runs deterministically over every fact and proves the pipeline's invariants hold. A pass here is necessary, not sufficient.
Does each value match the filing it cites? That needs the primary source, so it runs on a stratified sample checked back to the SEC XBRL record. This is the number that answers whether the citations hold.
Deterministic and reproducible over the whole corpus of 29,818,448 facts. Same corpus in, same numbers out.
Every fact's join key recomputes from its own content, with 0 mismatches across 29.8M facts.
Every one of 27.2M financial facts carries a valid citation in its jurisdiction's scheme.
Assets equal liabilities plus equity, bar 465 real exceptions surfaced and listed, not hidden.
Row-level integrity across 168.5M individual check-instances.
A stratified sample of 479 facts, each checked back to the SEC XBRL record, across US and foreign filers.
| Check | Result | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Value matches the SEC source | 100.00% | 99.2 to 100% |
| Value and the exact cited filing | 99.79% | 98.8 to 100% |
| Value, citation and exact concept | 99.16% | 97.9 to 99.7% |
| Wrong numbers, fabrications | 0 | 0 of 479 |
Request access and we will share the benchmark method, the sample and the re-runnable harness.